Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p
Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p is a video generation model listed in our catalog under WaveSpeed that animates a single still image into a short clip at 480p output resolution.
API Pricing
| Provider | Price /sec |
|---|---|
| $0.090/sec |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Aug 18, 2026
Model Details
General
- Creator
- WaveSpeed
- Modalities
- Text
Capabilities
- Tool Calling
- No
- Open Source
- No
- Aliases
- wavespeedai/wan-2.1-i2v-480p
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Image conditioning fixes subject appearance and composition, giving more control than text-only video generation
- 480p output tier keeps compute per clip lower than higher-resolution variants in the same Wan 2.1 image-to-video line
- Pairs naturally with text-to-image pipelines: generate a still, then animate the approved frame
- Suitable for rapid iteration and prompt testing before rendering at a higher resolution
- Available through hosted API endpoints, so no local GPU provisioning or model setup is required
- Part of the Wan 2.1 family, which includes multiple image-to-video resolution variants for stepping up quality
Limitations
- 480p output resolution is limited for large-screen or broadcast delivery and may require upscaling
- Requires an input image, so it cannot generate a clip from a text prompt alone
- Clip lengths for video models are typically short, limiting use for long-form narrative content
- Billed per generation or per second of video rather than per token, making cost comparisons with chat models inapplicable
- We do not track full parameter support (frame rate, duration options, audio) for this endpoint — verify against provider docs
Key Features
About Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p
Common Use Cases
Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p fits workloads where you already have a still image and want motion added to it: animating product photography for ecommerce listings, turning illustrations or character art into short looping clips, adding subtle motion to stock stills for social media and ad creative, and producing animated variations from outputs of a text-to-image model. The 480p tier is well suited to previewing and iterating on prompts and motion direction at lower cost per generation, and to high-volume batch jobs where delivery is to small-format social or in-app playback. Projects that need large-format or high-detail final renders will generally use this variant for exploration and then move to a higher-resolution image-to-video option, or apply an upscaling step downstream.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p cost?
Pricing varies by provider and by pricing type — video models are usually billed per generated clip or per second of output video rather than per token, and rates change frequently. Check the pricing table on this page for current figures from each provider we track.
What is Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p best used for?
It is best used for turning an existing still image into a short video clip: animating product shots, illustrations, or character art, and creating motion variants from text-to-image outputs. The 480p tier is especially practical for iteration, previews, and social-format delivery.
Can it generate video from a text prompt only?
No — this is an image-to-video variant, so it requires an input image as the conditioning frame. A text prompt is typically used alongside the image to describe the motion or camera movement, but the image is the required input. For prompt-only generation you would need a text-to-video model.
How does the 480p variant differ from higher-resolution Wan 2.1 image-to-video variants?
The difference is output resolution and the compute each generation requires. The 480p variant produces smaller frames and is generally cheaper and faster per clip, which suits iteration and high-volume work, while higher-resolution siblings in the family are used when final delivery needs more pixel detail.
Does it work as a chat or text model?
No. Wan 2.1 Image-to-Video 480p is a video generation model, so concepts like context window, token pricing, and tool calling do not apply. It is invoked as a generation endpoint that returns a video file rather than a text completion.