Kimi K3 is Moonshot AI's flagship open-weight model in the Kimi family, combining a 1,000,000-token context window with text and image input and tool calling.
| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.00 | $12.00 | - | |
| $2.34 | $11.70 | $0.261 | |
| $2.55 | $12.95 | $0.285 | |
| $2.85 | $14.25 | $0.285 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.750 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | - | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | - | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | - | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 | |
| $3.10 | $15.50 | $1.55 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Sep 11, 2026
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Benchmarks measured Sep 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Kimi K3 suits workloads where context size is the binding constraint: reviewing or refactoring across many source files, analyzing long contracts, research corpora, or logs in a single pass, and maintaining long-running agent sessions that accumulate history. Tool calling makes it usable as the planning model in agentic systems, and image input lets it handle mixed documents such as specs with diagrams or UI screenshots. Its flagship position and code generation focus point toward development assistance and complex multi-step reasoning rather than high-volume classification or short-form extraction, where its ~40 tokens/second output rate and ~2.1 second time to first token make cheaper, faster small models a better fit. Because the weights are open, it is also a candidate for teams with data-residency or on-premise requirements that rule out closed API-only models.
Pricing depends on which provider you use and the pricing type (input tokens, output tokens, cached input, and any long-context surcharges are often billed differently). Because Kimi K3 is an open-weight model served by several vendors, rates can vary considerably between them. See the pricing table on this page for current per-provider figures.
Long-context work and code-heavy tasks. The 1,000,000-token window suits whole-repository code analysis, large document review, and agent sessions with long histories, while tool calling supports function-dispatch workflows. It is less suited to high-volume, latency-sensitive short requests given its measured throughput.
Our metadata records Kimi K3 as an open-weight release from Moonshot, which is why it appears under provider-prefixed identifiers such as moonshotai/kimi-k3 across multiple inference platforms. Check Moonshot's own license terms for the specific conditions on commercial use and redistribution.
Both are aliases for Kimi K3 in our database. The kimi-k3-thinking name denotes a reasoning-oriented serving mode that produces extended internal deliberation before answering, which generally increases output token counts and latency compared with the standard chat mode.
Yes. Kimi K3's recorded modalities are text and image, so image input can be included alongside text in prompts. Whether a specific provider exposes image input on its endpoint should be confirmed against that provider's API documentation.
Independent measurements from Artificial Analysis report roughly 40.25 output tokens per second and a time to first token of about 2,139 ms. Actual figures depend on the provider, the hardware, the length of the prompt, and whether the reasoning mode is active.