MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is a chat model from Xiaomi in the MiMo series, positioned as a Flash-tier variant aimed at responsive conversational workloads.
API Pricing
Cheapest on Deep Infra — 1% below avg| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.140 | $0.280 | $0.0028 | |
| $0.140 | $0.280 | $0.0028 | |
| $0.140 | $0.280 | $0.140 | |
| $0.140 | $0.280 | $0.0028 | |
| $0.140 | $0.280 | $0.0028 | |
| $0.147 | $0.294 | $0.073 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Oct 6, 2026
MiMo-V2.6-Flash pricing by provider
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Performance & Benchmarks
Source: Artificial Analysis →Reasoning & Knowledge
- Humanity's Last Exam35.1%
Coding
- SciCode51.3%
Instruction & Long Context
- Long-Context Reasoning74.3%
Benchmarks measured Oct 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Model Details
General
- Creator
- Xiaomi
- Modalities
- Text
Capabilities
- Tool Calling
- No
- Open Source
- Yes
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Measured output generation of approximately 52 tokens per second in Artificial Analysis testing, sufficient for readable streaming in chat interfaces
- Flash-tier positioning within Xiaomi's MiMo line targets latency- and cost-sensitive workloads rather than maximum-capability reasoning
- Part of a named model family, so migration to or from other MiMo variants can reuse the same prompting conventions
- Chat-formatted model suitable for drop-in use in assistant, summarization, and drafting pipelines
- Independent third-party throughput measurement available rather than vendor-reported figures only
- Adds a non-US-vendor option to provider comparisons for teams diversifying model suppliers
Limitations
- Time to first token measured at roughly 3.1 seconds, which is slow for interactive use cases that expect near-instant response onset
- We do not track a confirmed context window for this model, so long-document suitability must be verified with the serving provider
- No standardized reasoning, coding, or knowledge benchmark scores are tracked for this model in our database
- Modality support beyond text is not confirmed in our data; assume text chat until a provider states otherwise
- Provider availability for MiMo models is narrower than for widely hosted open-weight families, which limits failover options
- Throughput figures are provider- and load-dependent and may not reflect what a given endpoint delivers under production traffic
Key Features
About MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Common Use Cases
MiMo-V2.6-Flash fits high-volume text workloads where per-request economics and steady generation speed matter more than deep multi-step reasoning: customer-facing chat assistants, content summarization, email and document drafting, data extraction into structured text, and classification or tagging over large batches. Its measured ~52 tokens/sec generation rate is adequate for streaming chat UIs, though the ~3.1 second time to first token makes it a weaker fit for voice agents, autocomplete, or other interactions where users notice any delay before the first word appears. For batch and asynchronous jobs that difference largely disappears, since only total completion time matters. Teams needing extended chain-of-thought reasoning, long-context document analysis, or verified coding benchmark performance should evaluate a higher-tier model and benchmark MiMo-V2.6-Flash against it on their own task set before committing.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does MiMo-V2.6-Flash cost to run?
Pricing varies by provider and by pricing model — some hosts bill separately for input and output tokens, others bundle or offer dedicated capacity. Because rates change frequently, see the pricing table on this page for current per-provider figures rather than relying on any fixed number.
What is MiMo-V2.6-Flash best used for?
It suits high-volume, latency-tolerant text work: chat assistants, summarization, drafting, extraction, and classification. The Flash tier positioning and mid-range measured throughput make it a general-purpose workhorse rather than a model to reach for on hard reasoning or research-grade analysis tasks.
How fast is MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Artificial Analysis measured roughly 52 output tokens per second with a time to first token of about 3.1 seconds. Generation speed is middling and the first-token delay is on the slow side, so responses begin with a visible pause and then stream at a readable pace. Actual numbers depend on the provider, region, and prompt length.
Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
Xiaomi develops the MiMo model series, of which MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the Flash-tier chat variant.
What context window does MiMo-V2.6-Flash support?
We do not have a confirmed context window recorded for this model. Check the documentation of whichever provider you plan to use, since hosted endpoints sometimes cap context below a model's maximum.
Should I pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash or a higher-tier model?
Choose the Flash variant when throughput and cost per request drive the decision and the task is routine text generation. If your workload involves multi-step reasoning, long documents, or agentic tool chains, evaluate a larger-tier model and compare output quality on your own prompts before deciding.