Magistral Small 1.2
Magistral Small 1.2 is a small-tier reasoning model from Mistral, positioned in the Magistral family as the compact counterpart to Mistral's larger Magistral Medium models.
API Pricing
Cheapest on Amazon AWS — 33% below avg| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M |
|---|---|---|
| $0.250 | $0.750 | |
| $0.500 | $1.50 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Oct 9, 2026
Compare API pricing for every Mistral model →Magistral Small 1.2 pricing by provider
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Performance & Benchmarks
Source: Artificial Analysis →Reasoning & Knowledge
- MMLU-Pro76.8%
- GPQA Diamond66.3%
- Humanity's Last Exam6.4%
Coding
- LiveCodeBench72.3%
Math
- AIME 202580.3%
Agentic & Tool Use
- Terminal-Bench Hard4.5%
- Terminal-Bench v2.14.5%
- τ²-bench27.8%
- τ-bench Banking4.5%
Instruction & Long Context
- IFBench44.4%
- Long-Context Reasoning19.3%
Benchmarks measured Oct 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Model Details
General
- Creator
- Mistral
- Modalities
- Text
Capabilities
- Open Source
- Yes
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Reasoning-tuned model available at the small tier, rather than only at large parameter scales
- Measured output throughput of roughly 141 tokens per second (Artificial Analysis), which matters for a model that emits reasoning traces
- Time to first token measured at about 709 ms, suitable for interactive use
- Iterative 1.2 release in the Magistral Small line, benefiting from refinements over earlier versions
- Small-tier sizing generally means lower serving cost per request than Mistral's larger Magistral models
- Part of Mistral's broader model catalog, so it can be paired with same-vendor embedding and non-reasoning models
Limitations
- Small-tier model — expect lower accuracy ceilings on difficult reasoning problems than larger Magistral models
- Reasoning traces consume additional output tokens, so effective per-request cost is higher than a comparable non-reasoning small model
- We do not track the context window, modality support, or tool-calling behavior for this entry — verify against provider documentation
- Limited independent benchmark coverage in our database beyond throughput and latency measurements
- Provider availability for smaller Mistral reasoning models is narrower than for widely hosted models from larger vendors
Key Features
About Magistral Small 1.2
Common Use Cases
Magistral Small 1.2 fits workloads that need step-by-step derivation at volume: math and quantitative word problems, rule-heavy data extraction where the model must check constraints before answering, multi-step classification with justification, and agent subtasks such as planning or self-verification steps that are dispatched frequently. Its measured throughput and sub-second time to first token make it usable in interactive settings like tutoring interfaces or developer assistants, where a reasoning trace would otherwise feel slow. It is a reasonable default for teams that want reasoning behavior across a broad request stream and reserve a larger Magistral or other large reasoning model for the subset of requests that fail quality checks. For simple summarization, formatting, or short-answer chat, a non-reasoning small model will typically be cheaper since it does not spend tokens on deliberation.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Magistral Small 1.2 cost to use?
Pricing depends on which provider hosts the model and on the pricing type — separate input and output token rates, batch or cached variants, and self-hosted GPU costs all differ. Because reasoning models emit intermediate reasoning tokens, output token pricing tends to dominate the bill. See the pricing table on this page for current per-provider rates.
What is Magistral Small 1.2 best used for?
It suits high-volume tasks that benefit from explicit step-by-step reasoning — math and logic problems, constraint-checked data extraction, classification with justification, and reasoning subtasks inside agent pipelines — where the cost of a larger reasoning model per request would be hard to justify.
How does Magistral Small 1.2 differ from Mistral's larger Magistral models?
It is the small tier of the same reasoning family. Expect lower latency and lower cost per request, with a lower accuracy ceiling on the hardest reasoning problems. A common pattern is to run Magistral Small for the bulk of traffic and escalate difficult cases to a larger Magistral model.
How fast is Magistral Small 1.2?
Artificial Analysis measures roughly 141 output tokens per second with a time to first token of about 709 ms. Actual figures vary by provider, region, prompt length, and load, so treat these as reference points rather than guarantees.
Should I pick Magistral Small 1.2 over a non-reasoning small model?
Choose it when your task involves multi-step derivation or constraint checking, where intermediate reasoning improves accuracy. For straightforward summarization, rewriting, or short chat responses, a non-reasoning small model will usually finish faster and generate fewer billed output tokens.