GPT-6 Sol is a chat model from OpenAI, measured by Artificial Analysis at roughly 126 output tokens per second with a notably long time to first token.
| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.00 | $5.00 | $0.100 | |
| $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.200 | |
| $2.00 | $10.00 | $0.200 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Sep 23, 2026
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Benchmarks measured Sep 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
GPT-6 Sol's measured latency profile — roughly 99 seconds to first token followed by steady ~126 tokens/second generation — points it toward asynchronous and batch workloads rather than live conversational interfaces. Reasonable fits include offline document analysis, overnight code review or refactoring passes, research summarization queues, agentic pipelines where a planning step runs out of band, and evaluation or data-generation jobs where throughput per hour matters more than perceived responsiveness. It is a poor match for autocomplete, real-time customer-facing chat, voice agents, or any interaction where a user waits on screen. If you need sub-second first-token latency, pair GPT-6 Sol with a faster small model that handles the interactive layer and escalate only the hard requests. Because we do not track confirmed context window or modality data for this model, validate those requirements against OpenAI's documentation before committing it to a production pipeline.
Pricing varies by provider and by pricing type — input tokens, output tokens, cached input, and batch or committed-capacity rates are all billed differently, and providers update their rates independently. See the pricing table on this page for current per-provider figures rather than relying on any fixed number.
Asynchronous and batch workloads where a long upfront processing delay is acceptable: offline document and codebase analysis, research synthesis, background agentic planning steps, and bulk generation or evaluation jobs. Its measured ~99 second time to first token makes it unsuitable for interactive chat, autocomplete, or voice applications.
Artificial Analysis measured roughly 99,227 ms before the first token appears, with generation then proceeding at about 125.67 tokens per second. That pattern typically indicates the model performs substantial processing before streaming output. Whatever the mechanism, the practical effect is that total latency is driven by the pre-generation phase, so budget timeouts accordingly.
We do not have a confirmed context window figure for GPT-6 Sol in our database. Check OpenAI's model documentation or your chosen provider's API reference for the authoritative limit before designing around large inputs.
Our metadata does not record modality support for this model, so we cannot confirm it either way. Verify supported input types with OpenAI or the specific provider you plan to use.
Compare on latency tolerance first. If your workload is user-facing and needs a response within a few seconds, the measured ~99 second first-token delay rules GPT-6 Sol out and a lower-latency model is the better choice. If the work runs in a queue and throughput per job matters more than responsiveness, GPT-6 Sol's ~126 tokens/second generation rate is competitive; compare the resulting cost per job using the pricing table above.