Claude Sonnet 4.6 is a text-and-image model from Anthropic in the Claude Sonnet line, offering a 1,000,000-token context window and an August 2025 knowledge cutoff.
| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.50 | $7.50 | $0.150 | |
| $1.50 | $7.50 | $0.150 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | - | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 | |
| $3.00 | $15.00 | $0.300 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Sep 6, 2026
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Benchmarks measured Sep 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Claude Sonnet 4.6 fits workloads that need substantial reasoning capability at a mid-tier cost point: software engineering assistants that must read across many files at once, contract and report analysis over hundreds of pages, and agentic pipelines where a long trace of tool calls and intermediate results accumulates in context. The 1M-token window makes it a reasonable choice for tasks where building a retrieval layer is more trouble than simply passing the full corpus, such as one-off codebase audits, migration planning, or reviewing a large set of related documents for consistency. Image input extends this to mixed-media inputs — UI screenshots, architecture diagrams, charts, and scanned forms. For very high-volume classification, routing, or extraction where per-token cost and latency dominate, a smaller Haiku-tier model is often the better economic fit; for the hardest multi-step reasoning problems, Anthropic's Opus tier is the usual step up.
Pricing depends on the provider you use and the pricing type — input tokens, output tokens, cached reads, and batch processing are typically billed at different rates, and long-context requests can carry different pricing than short ones. Because rates change frequently and vary between hosts, check the pricing table on this page for current figures rather than relying on a fixed number.
It suits coding assistance, long-document and repository analysis, and agentic workflows that accumulate large amounts of context. The 1,000,000-token window lets you pass full codebases or document sets directly, and image input covers screenshots, diagrams, and scanned pages alongside text.
Anthropic's lineup places Sonnet between Haiku and Opus. Haiku models target high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks at lower cost; Opus models target the most demanding reasoning work. Sonnet 4.6 is positioned as the general-purpose production option — capable enough for complex coding and analysis while cheaper than Opus. Compare live rates for each in the table above.
Yes. The model accepts both text and image input, so screenshots, charts, diagrams, and scanned documents can be included in a request alongside text.
Its training knowledge extends to roughly August 2025. For anything after that date, supply the information in the prompt or connect the model to a search or retrieval tool.
Third-party measurements from Artificial Analysis report around 46.8 output tokens per second and a time to first token of about 1,446 ms. Actual figures vary by provider, prompt length, and load, so treat these as approximate.