Ling-3.0-flash-VL
Ling-3.0-flash-VL is a chat model from InclusionAI in the Ling 3.0 series, positioned as a speed-oriented "flash" variant with a vision-language (VL) designation.
API Pricing
Cheapest on OpenRouter — 60% below avg| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.021 | $0.062 | $0.0042 | |
| $0.060 | $0.180 | $0.012 | |
| $0.075 | $0.220 | $0.015 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Oct 6, 2026
Ling-3.0-flash-VL pricing by provider
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Performance & Benchmarks
Source: Artificial Analysis →Reasoning & Knowledge
- GPQA Diamond86.2%
- Humanity's Last Exam22.0%
Coding
- SciCode44.2%
Agentic & Tool Use
- Terminal-Bench v2.164.4%
- τ-bench Banking34.4%
Instruction & Long Context
- Long-Context Reasoning78.3%
Benchmarks measured Oct 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Model Details
General
- Creator
- InclusionAI
- Modalities
- Text
Capabilities
- Tool Calling
- No
- Open Source
- Yes
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Measured output throughput of about 143 tokens per second in Artificial Analysis testing, suitable for streaming interfaces
- Positioned in the Ling 3.0 "flash" tier, which targets speed and cost efficiency rather than maximum reasoning depth
- The "VL" designation indicates a vision-language variant within the Ling 3.0 lineup, distinguishing it from text-only siblings
- Part of a maintained model series from InclusionAI, so sibling variants exist for trading capability against latency
- Chat-formatted interface, so it drops into existing message-based application code
- Throughput profile fits batch generation and pipeline workloads where many requests run concurrently
Limitations
- Time to first token of roughly 1,213 ms in third-party testing, which is noticeable in highly interactive, low-latency chat
- Context window length is not confirmed in our metadata — verify with the serving provider before planning long-document workloads
- We do not track confirmed benchmark scores for reasoning, coding, or math for this model, making capability comparisons harder
- Flash-tier models in general are tuned for speed over depth, so complex multi-step reasoning may be better served by a heavier tier in the same family
- Provider availability for Ling series models is narrower than for widely hosted Western model families, limiting routing and failover options
Key Features
About Ling-3.0-flash-VL
Common Use Cases
Ling-3.0-flash-VL fits workloads where generation speed and per-request economy matter more than deep chain-of-thought reasoning: customer-facing chat assistants with streamed output, summarization and rewriting of large document sets, classification and tagging over high request volumes, and content extraction pipelines. Where the provider exposes the vision path implied by the VL designation, it is a candidate for image or screenshot captioning, visual question answering, and document-image understanding at scale. Its ~143 tokens/second output rate supports jobs that generate long responses, while the roughly 1.2-second time to first token means teams building latency-critical voice or autocomplete experiences should benchmark it against alternatives first. For tasks demanding multi-step agentic planning or competition-level math, a higher reasoning tier — within the Ling family or elsewhere — is the more conventional choice.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Ling-3.0-flash-VL cost to use?
Pricing depends on which provider hosts the model and on the pricing type — input versus output tokens, and in some cases separate charges for image inputs or batch discounts. Because rates change frequently and differ between endpoints, check the live pricing table on this page for current figures rather than relying on any fixed number.
What is Ling-3.0-flash-VL best used for?
It suits high-volume, speed-sensitive chat and text-processing work: streamed assistant replies, summarization, rewriting, classification, and extraction pipelines. The VL designation points to vision-language use such as image and document-image understanding where the hosting provider enables that input.
How fast is Ling-3.0-flash-VL?
Third-party measurements from Artificial Analysis report roughly 143 output tokens per second with a time to first token of about 1,213 ms. Generation is quick once started, while the initial response delay is above one second, so the model reads as fast for long outputs and less snappy for very short interactive turns. Actual numbers vary by provider, region, and load.
What does the "flash" and "VL" naming mean in Ling-3.0-flash-VL?
"Flash" indicates the speed- and cost-oriented tier within InclusionAI's Ling 3.0 series rather than the series' heaviest reasoning tier. "VL" marks it as the vision-language variant of that tier, distinguishing it from text-only siblings in the same generation.
What context window does Ling-3.0-flash-VL support?
We do not have a confirmed context window length for this model in our database. If your workload depends on long inputs, check the model card published by InclusionAI or the documentation of the specific provider you plan to use.