DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is a 14-billion-parameter reasoning-oriented chat model from DeepSeek, created by distilling DeepSeek-R1 reasoning traces into a Qwen-based dense model.
| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1.60 | $1.60 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Sep 5, 2026
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Benchmarks measured Sep 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
This model suits workloads where multi-step reasoning is required but a large frontier reasoning model is too expensive or too heavy to host: competition-style math problems, algorithmic coding and debugging assistance, technical question answering that benefits from visible intermediate steps, and generating synthetic reasoning data for further fine-tuning. Its 14B dense size makes it a reasonable pick for on-premise or edge-adjacent deployments where data cannot leave a controlled environment, and for research teams who want to inspect or modify the weights. It is a weaker fit for high-volume, latency-sensitive tasks such as routing, moderation, or short classification calls, where the extended reasoning preamble adds cost without improving the result — a small non-reasoning instruct model is usually more appropriate there.
Pricing depends on which provider serves the model and on the pricing type — per-token API billing, hourly dedicated endpoints, or your own GPU costs if you self-host. Because it emits long chain-of-thought sequences, output tokens tend to dominate the bill. Check the pricing table on this page for current rates across providers.
It is best used for math, logic, and coding tasks that benefit from explicit step-by-step reasoning, and for teams that want R1-style reasoning behavior in a model small enough to run on a single GPU.
DeepSeek-R1 is a much larger mixture-of-experts reasoning model. This distill is a dense 14B Qwen-based model fine-tuned on reasoning traces generated by R1, so it imitates R1's answering style at a fraction of the serving cost, with lower accuracy on the hardest reasoning problems.
It sits in the middle of the family. The 1.5B, 7B, and 8B distills are cheaper and faster but less accurate on multi-step problems, while the 32B and 70B distills generally reason better at the cost of substantially more GPU memory.
Yes — the weights are published, and at 14B dense parameters the model fits on a single high-memory GPU, particularly with quantization. It works with common open-source inference servers.
No. It is a text-in, text-out chat model; multimodal input is not part of this release.