MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is a chat-oriented large language model from MiniMax, positioned by its "Flash" naming as a speed-focused variant within the M3.1 line.
API Pricing
Cheapest on Empirio Labs — 14% below avg| Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached / 1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.113 | $0.450 | $0.011 | |
| $0.150 | $0.600 | $0.015 |
Prices updated daily. Last check: Oct 20, 2026
Compare API pricing for every MiniMax model →MiniMax-M3.1-Flash pricing by provider
Input, output, and batch rates, plus alternatives, for one provider at a time.
Performance & Benchmarks
Source: Artificial Analysis →Reasoning & Knowledge
- Humanity's Last Exam48.0%
Coding
- SciCode53.4%
Instruction & Long Context
- Long-Context Reasoning79.7%
Benchmarks measured Oct 2026. Scores are independent evaluations, not vendor-reported.
Model Details
General
- Creator
- MiniMax
- Modalities
- Text
Capabilities
Strengths & Limitations
Strengths
- Measured output generation rate of approximately 142 tokens per second, suitable for streaming chat responses
- Time to first token of roughly 730 ms, meaning responses begin in under a second
- Positioned as the speed-oriented Flash tier of the MiniMax M3.1 line rather than a maximum-capability variant
- Built by MiniMax, which maintains a consistent M-series model line, making version-to-version migration straightforward
- Latency profile fits interactive assistants and high-request-volume batch text processing
- Available through inference providers tracked on this page, allowing direct rate comparison against other speed-tier models
Limitations
- Flash-tier models are generally tuned for speed over depth, so complex multi-step reasoning may favor larger siblings
- We do not currently track the context window for this model, so long-document workloads need verification against provider docs
- Input and output modality support is not confirmed in our data — do not assume image or audio handling
- Tool-calling and structured-output support are not recorded in our metadata and should be verified before agentic use
- Fewer published third-party benchmark results than widely deployed Western models, making cross-model quality comparison harder
Key Features
About MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Common Use Cases
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash suits workloads where request volume and response latency dominate the design: customer-facing chat assistants, in-product help and search answers, autocomplete and rewriting features, summarization of short-to-medium text, classification and routing steps inside larger pipelines, and content moderation triage. The sub-second time to first token and ~142 tokens/second generation rate mean a typical short reply completes quickly enough to feel immediate in a streaming UI. It is a reasonable default for the first stage of a tiered setup, where most requests are handled by the fast model and only ambiguous or high-stakes cases are escalated to a larger MiniMax model or another vendor's reasoning tier. For tasks requiring extended chain-of-thought math, large-codebase refactoring, or very long document analysis, evaluate a higher-capability model and confirm context window limits with your provider first.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does MiniMax-M3.1-Flash cost?
Pricing varies by inference provider and by pricing type — input tokens, output tokens, and any cached or batch rates are each billed differently, and providers change rates over time. See the pricing table on this page for current per-provider figures rather than relying on a quoted number.
What is MiniMax-M3.1-Flash best used for?
It is best suited to high-volume, latency-sensitive text work: chat assistants, summarization, rewriting, classification, and routing steps in multi-model pipelines. The measured ~730 ms time to first token and ~142 tokens/second output rate make it a fit for streaming interfaces where users watch the response appear.
How fast is MiniMax-M3.1-Flash?
Artificial Analysis measurements recorded about 142 output tokens per second with a time to first token of roughly 730 milliseconds. Actual figures vary by provider, region, prompt length, and current load, so treat these as a reference point rather than a guarantee.
How does the Flash variant differ from other MiniMax M3.1 models?
The Flash naming indicates the speed- and cost-oriented tier of the M3.1 generation. Variants higher in a family line are typically tuned for harder reasoning and longer outputs, while Flash tiers prioritize fast first-token response and sustained generation throughput. Check MiniMax's documentation for the exact capability differences between the variants currently offered.
What context window does MiniMax-M3.1-Flash support?
We do not currently track a confirmed context window for this model. Before building a long-document or long-conversation application on it, verify the supported limit with MiniMax's documentation or the specific inference provider you plan to use, since providers sometimes cap context below the model's native maximum.